Shuffle Alley How Does A Man Not Of The US, With Ties To Terrorists Training Camp, Get Charged Like A Mugger In Civil Court?
How does a man not of the US, with ties to Terrorists training camp, get charged like a mugger in civil court? - shuffle alley
Lingerie bombers has been accused in civil court today, and you can imagine, has pleaded not guilty.
I do not understand how an enemy combatant are mixed in the civil courts, as if the same level of risk that the thief will meet in a dark alley. Who can explain it?
|
5 comments:
No reason, in this case, the judge was not guilty
does not answer some questions and said he had
Analgesics. The process took less than 5 minutes, another time
turned to the judge with his lawyer to speak, now the next part,
This person was immediately sent to Guantanamo. He would
called into question was issued by the specialist, privileges and as Miranda
Lawyer. For now, we lost all the information that could have offered
to whom and how many were created and trained with him.
It is an unlawful combatants who are not protected under the provisions of the Geneva Conventions,
and therefore falls under the jurisdiction of the U.S. military, the FBI did not.
He was charged criminally over 8 different circumstances, would be more demanding
life imprisonment without parole for
Attempt to commit the murder of 300 people
a weapon of mass destruction.
Apparently the charges were civil in this case, not a criminal charge. If the prosecutors believe they have enough evidence to file criminal charges are likely. In this way, the time to gather the evidence purchased at the expense of defense and time is the entire sentence can be added, adding that the crimes have a different level. It may be that the sentence is for civilian security is a charge because the evidence while the prosecution can lead to a long trial and / or the uncertainty of the sentence. Not to the lives of the lawyers (defense and prosecution envy)?
Under the Bush administration had 119 cases of terrorism, the Federal Court against 289 defendants, including Richard Reid, December 2001. A British citizen and self-confessed supporter of Osama bin Laden, Reid hid explosives in his shoes before trying to board a flight from Paris to Miami, light the wick with a match. When detonated explosives that damaged the plane. Reid was detained and imprisoned on board the plane by flight attendants and passengers.
In 2003, Reid was sentenced on charges of terrorism and a U.S. federal court sentenced him to life imprisonment.
In addition, there is a difference between civil courts and tribunals.
Welcome to Obamaland. It's the only explanation.
For the Marxists, there is no war on terror.
Post a Comment